Review form

Full title of paper *

Comment *

Original workMinor extension of old technique or existing knowledgeLittle or no originalityReview paper

Subject matter *

Within the scope of the journalNot appropriate for the journalRevision required

Readability of English *

Easy to understandDifficult to understand and improvements are neededUnreadable and should be rewritten

Is the title clear and adequate? *

DetailsYesNo

Is the Aim adequate? *

Yes.No.

Is the abstract adequate? *

YesNo

Are the conclusions adequate? *

YesNo

Are statistics within the scope? *

YesNo

Are the references adequate? *

YesNo

Are the illustrations of good quality? *

YesNoNo illustrations were used.

Are the Graphics of good quality? *

YesNo

Does results corresponds to aims *

Overall Rating *

UnacceptableBelow AverageAverageGoodExcellent

Note to Author(s)

Confidential Record to Chief Editor only

Information on this page will not be conveyed to the author(s).

Recommendations *

Acceptable in present form.Acceptable if suggested revisions are made and re-review is not required.Acceptable only if suggested revisions are made and re-review is required.Unacceptable. Reasons for objections are attached.

Reviewer’s Name : *

Telephone No: *

Email : *

Paper review form

Verification